Elon Musk, chief executive officer of Tesla Inc., during a fireside discussion on artificial intelligence risks with Rishi Sunak, UK prime minister, not pictured, in London, UK, on Thursday, Nov. 2, 2023.
Tolga Akmen | Bloomberg | Getty Images
That’s a large stake, especially considering that Musk sold tens of billions of dollars worth of his shares in Tesla in 2022, largely to finance a $44 billion leveraged buyout of Twitter.
Now, Musk is angling for even more control over Tesla.
Specifically, Musk wrote on Monday, “I am uncomfortable growing Tesla to be a leader in AI & robotics without having ~25% voting control. Enough to be influential, but not so much that I can’t be overturned.”
“Unless that is the case, I would prefer to build products outside of Tesla,” the billionaire executive said on X.
“You don’t seem to understand that Tesla is not one startup, but a dozen. Simply look at the delta between what Tesla does and GM. As for stock ownership itself being enough motivation, Fidelity and other own similar stakes to me. Why don’t they show up for work?”
Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Musk’s post stood at odds with remarks he previously made suggesting Tesla is already an important AI and robotics company, and its value hinges on its prowess in these domains.
In April 2022, Musk predicted during Tesla’s first-quarter earnings call that the company’s humanoid robot, Optimus, “ultimately will be worth more than the car business and worth more than full self-driving.”
Tesla unveiled an early Optimus prototype at Tesla AI Day in September that year, and Musk said in a post around that event: “The point of AI Day is to show the immense depth & breadth of Tesla in AI, compute hardware & robotics.”
More recently, on Dec. 27, 2023, Musk criticized Roth Capital senior research analyst Craig Irwin who appeared on CNBC’s Closing Bell Overtime, saying he thought Tesla was “egregiously overvalued,” especially compared to Japanese autos giant Toyota.
Bristling at the comparison to a large competitor that has sold more hybrid electric vehicles than battery electric models, Musk said in a post on X, “He has the wrong frame of reference. Tesla is an AI/robotics company.”
While Tesla’s last annual or 10-K filing showed that around 95% of its revenue came from its “automotive” segment in 2022, in its third-quarter 2023 financial filing, the company described its business as “increasingly focused on products and services based on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation.”
Even on Monday morning, Musk posted a video clip on X showing the Optimus robot in development folding laundry at a table, although the robot was remote-operated and not autonomous.
Musk’s wish to control even more of Tesla will undoubtedly add to the pressure on Tesla’s board of directors in 2024.
In addition to determining appropriate CEO and director compensation, Tesla’s board is already facing some investors’ concerns over several issues.
Some investors and lawmakers have expressed concerns over: Musk’s split focus and use of company resources as he continues to run SpaceX, X Corp. and other ventures alongside Tesla; his divisive political and cultural commentary, including recent tweets disparaging corporate diversity and inclusion initiatives; federal probes involving Musk and Tesla; and worries over drug use by the CEO, recently reported by Wall Street Journal.
Musk is also in the midst of a trial in Delaware over his earlier $56 billion pay package from Tesla. The unparalleled 2018 CEO compensation plan made Musk into one of the richest people on the planet.
Shareholder Richard J. Tornetta has sued Musk and Tesla, alleging the CEO’s compensation was excessive and its authorization amounted to a breach of fiduciary duty by Tesla and its board.
Musk also noted on Monday that Tesla’s board of directors is waiting to establish a new compensation plan for him until the Tornetta case is decided in the Delaware chancery court.
He wrote: “The reason for no new ‘compensation plan’ is that we are still waiting for a decision in my Delaware compensation case. The trial for that was held in 2022, but a verdict has yet to be made.”
Referring to his call for 25% voting control, he said: “If I have 25%, it means I am influential, but can be overridden if twice as many shareholders vote against me vs for me. At 15% or lower, the for/against ratio to override me makes a takeover by dubious interests too easy.”
In an earlier trial in Delaware, several Tesla board members agreed last year to pay back $735 million to the company in a settlement agreement over their own director compensation.
Barbara Terrio is a seasoned business journalist, delving into the world of finance, startups, and entrepreneurship. With a knack for demystifying complex economic trends, she helps readers navigate the business landscape. Outside of her reporting, Barbara is an advocate for financial literacy and enjoys mentoring aspiring entrepreneurs.
