“Shark Tank” investor and businessman Kevin O’Leary has a message for California governor Gavin Newsom: “Wake up and smell the hydrocarbons.”
California’s climate change policies have come under fire this week after Chevron revealed it faces a profit hit of up to $4 billion due to restrictive regulations in the Golden State. The regulations “have resulted in lower anticipated future investment levels,” the company said in a filing on Jan. 2, per Bloomberg.
Don’t miss
In an interview on Fox Business, O’Leary slammed the state’s “uncompetitive” energy policies and called California’s management “the worst of every state in the union.”
Despite claiming to “like” Newsom after meeting him in person, O’Leary described the democratic governor as “clueless to the competition” in the energy market between states — adding, “I wouldn’t let him manage a candy store.”
He called California “a very bad place to do business” for energy companies and their investors. Is O’Leary right?
California vs. Big Oil
In late 2022, Newsom announced an ambitious climate action plan that would slash greenhouse gas emissions by 85% and drop gas consumption by 94% by 2045.
After reporting Big Oil made $200 billion in profits in 2022, Newsom accused them of “fleecing Californians at the pump” and promised to hold them accountable. State lawmakers are considering capping refining profits.
Speaking at the opening ceremony of New York City’s Climate Week in September, Newsom accused oil supermajors of “lying” about climate change. He said: “The climate crisis is, after all, a fossil fuel crisis. They continue to play us for fools. I’ve had enough and I’m sick and tired of this.”
Read more: Find out how to save up to $820 annually on car insurance and get the best rates possible
In the same week, California filed a civil lawsuit against five energy giants — Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips and California-based Chevron — accusing them of misleading the public and downplaying how fossil fuels are contributing to climate change.
Chevron CEO Mike Wirth rejected that claim, telling Bloomberg: “Climate change is a global issue. It calls for a coordinated global policy response, not piecemeal litigation that benefits attorneys and politicians.”
Investment capital in California
The Golden State’s not-so-golden treatment of Big Oil has had a huge impact on its willingness to invest in the nation’s most populous state.
According to Bloomberg, in December, Andy Walz, president of Chevron’s Americas Products business, wrote in a filing: “California’s policies have made it a difficult place to invest so we have rejected capital projects in the state.”
He added: “Such capital flight reflects the state’s inadequate returns and adversarial business climate.”
As an investor in the energy industry, O’Leary has rejected California because of its “bad policy [and] weak management” that he claims is “hurting the California economy and people.”
Instead, he would rather pump money into states like North Dakota, Virginia, Oklahoma and Texas because “they’re competing for my money” and have regulatory environments that boost — rather than hinder — energy security.
“Who would give a dime to California to invest in energy when the regulatory environment is so punitive you can’t make money?” he said. “That’s what Chevron’s telling everybody.”
What to read next
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Barbara Terrio is a seasoned business journalist, delving into the world of finance, startups, and entrepreneurship. With a knack for demystifying complex economic trends, she helps readers navigate the business landscape. Outside of her reporting, Barbara is an advocate for financial literacy and enjoys mentoring aspiring entrepreneurs.
